Magna Carta – did she die in vain?

Posted by The Skibbereen Eagle | June 15, 2015 22

Magna carta“Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?” asked an exasperated Tony Hancock playing the jury foreman in an episode of his Half Hour. Clearly not. Far from dying, Magna Carta has had a life longer, fuller and more influential than the most optimistic medieval baron could have imagined.

Today marks the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta so quite rightly there is a lot of focus on what this lofty old document means for modern day human rights. You know an event is important when it gets its own Google Doodle. The Magna Carta’s legacy has endured — but it was initially valid only for about 10 weeks. That’s because after receiving King John’s letter, Pope Innocent issued a pronouncement: “I declare the charter to be null and void of all validity forever.”MagnaCarta2

Magna Carta originated in 1215 as a peace treaty between King John and a group of rebellious barons The original document was written in Latin on parchment made from animal skin The name didn’t emerge until the document’s reissue in 1217. It became known as The Great Charter to differentiate it from the smaller Charter of the Forest issued at the same time. MagnaClause39

But why is a charter from 1215, which was declared null and void by the Pope within weeks of being written, which doesn’t mention “trial by jury” or “habeas corpus” (the right not to be held indefinitely without trial), and which forbids any woman from accusing a man of murder or manslaughter, seen as the foundation of our liberties and our law? magnafoundationmagna-carta_Google

In 1215 England’s King John was in trouble. He had spent heavily on a failed attempt to regain his Angevin Empire in France; the French were threatening to invade; rebellious barons, whom he had been fleecing to finance his wars, were marching against him. He had no choice but to sue for peace with the rebels; the peace treaty, sealed at Runnymede on the Thames on June 15th, was called the Magna Carta. Since the barons had the upper hand, its main thrust was to protect their rights against monarchical abuse. It did not, as some suppose, spawn democracy (which only started to emerge even in embryonic form rather later) or trial by jury (which was already in use). But its chapter 39 (29 in subsequent versions) asserted the right to due process of law—“no free man shall be seized or imprisoned…except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”—for which it has been revered ever since.

As a peace treaty, it was a failure: John reneged on it a month later. But the charter survived because the king died the following year and William Marshal, regent to the nine-year-old Henry III, reissued it to persuade the rebel barons to support the young king against the French. It worked: the barons rallied round and the charter was revised and reissued several times. The location of the negotiations at the Saxon meeting place of Runnymede was important. For in the Saxon tradition and Law Rulers were not absolute but had to earn the respect of their subjects and rule “in Council” giving particular weight to the views of the elders. Absolutism with the King being the source of all justice and owning all property came with the Normans under William the Conqueror. But the English kicked back against absolutism at Runnymede  and later. The Saxon way continuously reasserted itself in the formation of Parliament, the “Glorious Revolution” and in the foundation stone of democracy, Local Government, where the Saxon tradition of Council and word of “Aldermen” still exists. It is these Saxon traditions that JRR Tolkien, a Professor of Old Saxon,  harks back to in the “Lord of the Rings” where the goodness of “The Shire” where decisions are made by consensus is contrasted with the Dark Lord Sauron and the terrible consequences of absolutism.

At its heart is the idea that the law is not simply the whim of the king, or the government. It is the great egalitarian legacy of Magna Carta, that all are equal under the law, and all can be held to account. It is that idea that gave birth to so many of our rights and freedoms, to parliamentary democracy, fair trial, and a series of controls on the abuse of arbitrary power. MagnaCartaQueen MagnaCartaRunnymede

Still, the Magna Carta might have disappeared into the mists of medieval history were it not for two political turning points at which revolutionaries found it convenient to present themselves as traditionalists. The first was the English Civil War, when Sir Edward Coke, former chief justice, dug up the charter and used it in service of his argument that there was precedent for limiting the power of the monarch. It thus formed the basis of the Petition of Right, a proto-constitution which the parliamentarians forced the king to sign. The second turning point at which the Magna Carta resurfaced was the American War of Independence, when rebellious colonists cited the Charter against parliament just as parliament had used it against the king. MagnaCarta

Of the original charter’s 63 chapters only three—one confirming the freedom of the church, one confirming the liberties of the City of London and the crucial chapter 39—remain on Britain’s statute book. But as an emblem of the long struggle of people everywhere against the excesses of an arbitrary ruler, it retains great power.


Attorney General of the United States, Loretta Lynch, spoke passionately about the legacy of Magna Carta and the importance of the Rule of Law.

Today at the site of the Magna Carta’s signing at Runnymede the great and good gathered to commemorate its 800th Anniversary – The Queen, Prince William, Prime Minister David Cameron and the US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who has shown the world how to cut the crap when it comes to FIFA. Magna-Carta-Notice

How shameful then that David Cameron should demean the occasion by using the anniversary to engage in cheap politicking, penning an article in the Murdoch Rag the Sun to use the Magna Carta to spuriously support his pointless crusade to get Britain to abandon the European Convention on Human Rights as part of his great “European re-negotiation.” Poor Bulli Boy David probably doesn’t understand The European Convention on Human Rights has nothing to do with the European Union, which it predates. It has everything to do with Winston Churchill and his determination that the Nazis perversion of Law and use of the resources of a state (Police, Courts, Prison, Concentration Camps, Euthanasia, Slave Labour, Sterilisation, etc; etc;) to abuse Human Rights would never be repeated.

Perhaps young David Cameron skipped that Civics class to go trashing restaurants and bully the little people or maybe while telling everybody else to remember, his memory is slipping? Human rights are not a gift to be bestowed upon us by monarchs, barons or democratically elected politicians, they are ours to be treasured and protected. It is not up to them to decide who and who is not entitled to human rights – the ‘human’ part of this is universal. That is why they are “inalienable” they belong to US as OUR rights.

13 Jun 2015, Taplow, Buckinghamshire, England, UK --- Taplow, United Kingdom. 13th June 2015 -- Gloriana, surrounded by riverboats and barges of all sizes during the River Relay on the River Thames. -- The Royal Rowbarge, Gloriana, took a role of honour on the River Thames as facsimiles of the Magna Carta document were handed over in a two-day river relay which stopped off at various points on the route where enactments took place. --- Image by © Lynda Bowyer/Demotix/Corbis

Gloriana, surrounded by riverboats and barges of all sizes during the River Relay on the River Thames. — The Royal Rowbarge, Gloriana, took a role of honour on the River Thames as facsimiles of the Magna Carta document were handed over in a two-day river relay which stopped off at various points on the route where enactments took place. 


If the Prime Minister is sincere about protecting human rights in the UK and is proud of the Magna Carta’s legacy, he should stop attacking the Human Rights Act and think about how he can ensure that we all have equal access to justice. The enduring legacy of Magna Carta is that Human Rights and Freedom under Law belong to us all. In a time of secret courts in Britain and the Guantanamo gulag, the threat to rights from terror laws and state surveillance of our online activities, do we need to reaffirm its basic principles? Should we take things even further, as Tim Berners-Lee has suggested, and create a new Magna Carta for the worldwide web to protect our liberty online?

The Skibbereen Eagle

In 1898, to widespread bemusement, a small Provincial Newspaper in an equally small town in the South West corner of Ireland sonorously warned the Czar of Russia that it knew what he was up to and he should be careful how he proceeded for “The Skibbereen Eagle” was wise to his game and in future would be keeping its eye on him! It is doubtful that Nicholas II, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias, even noticed the Eagle’s admonitions but as history soon proved he should have paid closer attention to the Eagle’s insightful opinions!

Today, powered by its readers and contributors, from its cyber eyries in Ireland and the centres of the Irish Diaspora The Eagle casts its Cold Eye on Life and Death and much in between.
The Skibbereen Eagle

Latest posts by The Skibbereen Eagle (see all)

22 Responses